Oxymoron? “Emotional Robot”

August 9th, 2010

A robot who expresses emotions…isn’t this an oxymoron?

Nao: The Robot with Feelings

“The wiring of the robot’s “brain”, designed to mirror the neural network of the human mind, allows it to remember its interactions with different people and memorise their faces. This understanding, along with a set of basic rules about what is “good” and “bad” for it, allow the robot to indicate whether it is “sad” or “happy”…Cañamero believes that robots will act as human companions in future…some scientists believe that robots could be used to help around the house, or to care for the elderly.

Two thoughts come to mind:  What kind of a society will we have become if we delegate the deepest needs of the heart…the human connection…to  soul-less robots?  Providing fellowship, companionship…giving of ourselves, especially when it is not easy to do…is what makes us truly human.  Robots, while convenient for chores and difficult or dangerous tasks, could fuel self-centeredness: “I don’t have spend time visiting with Granny this week.  Nao 75 is with her, so she’ll be fine. ”

Second:  Who determines the rules about what’s “good” and “bad?”  Our robot buddies’ actions will reflect the moral code of the programmers.  Think about it.  Look at the gulf that exists in the world today between those who espouse moral relativism and those who believe in moral absolutes and natural law?  Will we have a say in programming the moral code of our cyber-companions?

Just wondering…..

Cents-Less Corporate Ethics?

July 8th, 2010

Imagine that you recently lost your job and the bills are piling up.  However, you take pains to pay your COBRA insurance premium in full and on time because you suffer from leukemia and require monthly chemo treatments.  Shortly thereafter, while hospitalized for treatment,  a letter arrives announcing that your medical benefits are being terminated for a short payment of…ready for it? ONE PENNY!!

How would you feel?  Outraged?

That’s how La Rosa Carrington of Denver felt when it happened to her last week.   She immediately phoned the benefits administration company, believing a mistake had been made.  She spoke with a customer service representative twice and a company supervisor;  both steadfastly maintained that the bill was accurate and demanded the same thing:  pay the ONE PENNY via check or money order and then we will restore your benefits!

It wasn’t until Ms. Carrington suggested that the media would be interested in her story that the supervisor decided to check her figures and whadda ya know?  The company had made a rounding error!  La Rosa had, indeed, paid in full.   ( FYI, the company is disputing this report which is why I have chosen not to name them….)

Is the Legal Thing always the Right Thing?

Error or not, why cancel a person’s medical benefits for one cent?  Any rational, ethical employee understands that no policy-holder deliberately underpays by a penny.  They would assume it was a mere clerical error and waive the payment.  Legally, benefits administrators have the freedom to waive any amount from one penny up to 10% of the COBRA premium…but they don’t have to.

Since it cost far more than one cent to mail Ms. Carrington the termination notice,  I suspect that the company viewed the shortage as a legal way to get rid of a policy holder whose treatment was costing them too much money.  It was a legal business decision,  but was it ethical? Was it the right thing to do?

Integrity gone AWOL

The benefits administration company describes itself as “a customer-focused organization” and lists “Integrity” as one of its core values:  “We do the right thing with integrity, honesty and respect. ”

Clearly, the employees’ actions in this case did not align with the company’s published values.  Why?  Perhaps the employees  didn’t know they had the authority to waive a penny fee.  Maybe they were  ignorant of the corporate values?  Or could it have been that the posted values were just corporate window dressing and never promoted as an integral part of day-to-day decision-making?

Then again, perhaps the employees wanted to do the right thing, but feared negative consequences for doing so.  In this economy, the intense pressure to maximize revenue and cut costs often pushes ethics and empathy to the back of the line.  According to the 2009 National Business Ethics Survey, belt-tightening procedures have contributed to a dramatic increase of ethical misconduct.

What to do?

It makes a difference when a company’s ethics and values code is a living, breathing behavior guide rather than a dead document decorating the walls of corporate headquarters.  Ethical decision-making is also more effective when individuals have taken the time to reflect upon their personal ethical standards and considered what to do in the event of an ethical clash between business and personal ethics.

In future postings, we’ll take a look at these issues as well as the true costs of ethical misconduct and how to use emotional intelligence to strengthen personal and corporate ethics.

Optimism: The Legacy of St. Ethan of the Hood

June 17th, 2010

Imagine this:  You’re 18 years old–an outgoing, well-liked, kinda crazy, engaging young man–when the cancer you thought you beat at age 3 returns suddenly and with a vengeance. You fight courageously through more than a year of debilitating treatments, all to no avail. The doctor tells you to put your affairs in order because you only have a few short months to live.

So, what do you do now?

If you’re Ethan Mills of Tempe, AZ you hold the biggest, baddest “phat-est” going away party ever!  On May 22, with the support of family, friends and neighbors (the “Hood”) the local church’s ball field became a “no cry zone” complete with inflatable moon walks, a water slide, pinatas, tons of food and a tent where people were encouraged to write memory letters to Ethan. Attendees received free commemorative “Go Big or Go Home” t-shirts; live bands played…and Ethan  spoke, expressing his gratitude to the 600+ gathered friends, caregivers and loved ones for all they had done for him throughout his journey.

I’ve had the privilege of knowing this young man’s amazing family for more than 25 years.  Ethan’s life, regardless of his physical condition, was marked with refreshing, relentless joy. He had a choice, and he chose to live in faith-filled optimism rather than  learned helplessness.  “Death is not a bad thing and I am not scared of it,” wrote Ethan on his Facebook page: “God will either heal me, or call me home, and I am very content with both of those so please do not be sad or worried about me. “

What was the impact of that joy-filled life?  A major Phoenix newspaper reported the story of Ethan’s Big Phat Party; it was later picked up by several TV stations and somehow made its way to CNN.  Thousands of on-line comments poured in from around the globe; most were about how this young man’s courage inspired them, healed them and gave them hope for themselves or a loved one….even though they had never met face-to-face.

Ethan died just 18 days after the party. The church was packed to the rafters for his funeral and included many who didn’t know him personally but came anyway to honor his short but courageous life.

Some people show us how to live well; other show us how to die well. In his brief stay on this planet, Ethan’s choice for optimism showed us both. Thank you, St. Ethan of the Hood…we will miss your contagious joy!

Welcome!

June 16th, 2010

Brain stew!

That’s an apt description for the diverse mixture of ideas, comments, rants and raves you’ll find on this blog around the topics of brain science, social-emotional intelligence, emotional resiliency and what I like to call “Savvy Service: Emotionally Intelligent Customer Care.” I’d love to hear your thoughts and inspirations and would enjoy a respectful conversation with you on these or any related topics.